Crypto Bills Shouldn’t Be Bitcoin or Bust, Says Indiana Lawmaker

Bitcoin would be the first cryptocurrency ever created, however it shouldn’t be the one one lifted by legislative initiatives throughout the U.S., in response to Indiana State Rep. Kyle Pierce.

The Republican, who launched laws earlier this month, instructed Decrypt that his invoice centered on Indiana’s remedy of cryptocurrency was written in a means that was deliberately broad. He described that as a matter of precept, in addition to optics.

“I did not wish to get on this state of affairs the place somebody can say, ‘Oh, you’re selecting winners and losers’” he mentioned, “My purpose is to advertise the cryptocurrency market, not Bitcoin, Ethereum, Tether, or no matter it could be.”

Pierce’s invoice, in its preliminary kind, calls on the state to permit public providers to spend money on exchange-traded funds providing cryptocurrency publicity via retirement and financial savings applications. It additionally calls on Indiana to determine protections for crypto customers and corporations.

The invoice is distinct from laws in states like New Hampshire, which allow governments to spend money on digital belongings themselves, with the caveat that allocations are restricted to these with a market capitalization of over $500 billion—a milestone that Bitcoin has solely reached.

Amongst business teams that Pierce used as “sounding boards,” he recalled the Satoshi Motion Fund, a corporation that collects donations in Bitcoin however not different digital belongings. On its web site, Satoshi Motion says, “Our coverage has been handed into legislation in eight states.”



Pierce mentioned “there have been some discussions” of a market-cap threshold in crafting his invoice, however he didn’t view it as a legitimate place to begin. Nonetheless, in terms of funding alternatives for public servants, he acknowledged that not all cryptocurrencies are appropriate.

“The cryptocurrency that was began final Tuesday—perhaps we shouldn’t [enable] retirement investments,” he mentioned. “We would get there with the invoice.”

Nonetheless, Pierce’s laws contains protections for cryptocurrency miners, which eat numerous power in maintaining networks like Bitcoin safe. Different blockchains, reminiscent of Ethereum, use 99.9% much less power because of the community’s proof-of-stake consensus mechanism.

“They won’t get particular remedy, however we’re additionally ensuring you gained’t be capable to pinpoint them and attempt to focus adverse authorities actions in opposition to them,” he mentioned of miners.

So far as conversations about crypto with constituents go, Pierce mentioned that he’s engaged with a miner that’s a 10-minute drive from his district’s borders, in addition to a number of people.

Pierce mentioned that it was tough to get hearings for crypto-focused laws earlier than, together with a invoice that he had beforehand proposed with protections for miners. However that shifted with the passage of stablecoin laws on the federal degree earlier this yr, he mentioned, with President Trump signing the GENIUS Act into legislation in July.

“I feel that there’s much more belief,” he mentioned. “I don’t wish to assume that it is going to go. You by no means wish to try this. However there’s not been this main opposition but.”