Observe Nikolaus On X Right here
When you had been tuned into the Massachusetts Senate debate final night time, you’ll have observed a key change between pro-Bitcoin candidate John Deaton and his rival Elizabeth Warren, chief of Washington D.C.’s “anti-crypto military.”When pressed by Deaton, Warren wouldn’t even defend herself. After mendacity and attacking our trade for years, she stated “I’m superb if individuals need to purchase and promote crypto.” Critically.
My massive concern with this second is that it says every thing concerning the Democrats and the lip service they’re taking part in to the Bitcoin trade.
It’s plain that Bitcoin has was a partisan concern on this nation for essentially the most half. Most Democrats have adopted Warren in taking a robust stance towards supporting Bitcoin (even when they received’t admit it). I believe Presidential candidate Kamala Harris has executed the identical.
Case and level, even Harris this week issued a generic “we are going to assist blockchain and digital belongings,” whereas not specifying precisely what she would do to assist it.
However oh wait, she really did put forth a brand new coverage proposal yesterday, and to nobody’s shock, it was a race based mostly one which excludes most Individuals. It was a flop within the trade.
I’ve to ask at this level, how way more do pro-Democrat Bitcoiners must see?
The Republicans have clearly embraced the trade. They’ve put forth laws proposals in an try to foster extra innovation within the house. They defend the trade from assaults coming from the Democrats. They attend Bitcoin conferences and occasions, take heed to trade leaders, and purchase and maintain bitcoin personally.They haven’t been shy of their public assist for Bitcoin, and have additionally actively made it an official a part of their celebration platform. That’s how severe they’re.
The present main presidential candidate, Donald Trump, has made many pledges to assist and develop the trade, proposing particular coverage on what he would enact if elected.
Earlier this summer time, Trump raised $25 million from non-public particular person donors on the Bitcoin 2024 Convention in Nashville (his second highest fundraiser throughout his three campaigns). American Bitcoin miners have met with Trump in Mar-A-Lago to debate what they want him to do as president to assist their companies.
The place Republicans have leaned into Bitcoin, we have now seen the other with Democrats. At nearly each single congressional and Senate listening to I watch, Democrats vote towards favorable Bitcoin regulation, and make verbal assaults on the trade.
At a congressional listening to solely 4 months in the past, Democratic Congresswoman Maxine Waters really tried to make the case that we must always implement a CBDC, and never ban it, as a result of nations like China are embracing it. She referred to as it the subsequent “house race”.
It’s crystal clear to anybody watching these congressional and senate hearings which aspect the Democrats have chosen in terms of Bitcoin vs CBDC.
That is my massive concern.
If elected president, I consider Harris would have little motive to assist the trade, and each motive to proceed attacking it, as she’s executed as vp during the last 4 years.
This election is a fierce battle for energy of america of America. Folks and industries and selecting their sides, and if Kamala wins, she may not be so good to the industries who closely tried to get her opponent elected president.
If Bitcoiners need to see this trade not get attacked prefer it has these previous 4 years, and see it thrive over the subsequent 4 years, they should make their voices heard on the poll field this November – and, prefer it or not, they should vote Republican.
This text is a Take. Opinions expressed are totally the writer’s and don’t essentially mirror these of BTC Inc or Bitcoin Journal.
