Bitwise Asset Administration stated that it has no reference to one other agency of the identical identify whose founders are dealing with fees.
The asset administration agency wrote on Nov. 9:
“San Francisco-based Bitwise Asset Administration, Inc., the most important crypto index fund supervisor in America, has no relationship with, and has by no means had a relationship with, the now-defunct Bitwise Industries, a former know-how firm based mostly in Fresno, California.”
Bitwise Asset Administration is among the many most notable asset managers which can be presently trying to achieve approval for a spot Bitcoin ETF by the U.S. Securities and Trade Fee (SEC). It already provides quite a few different crypto-related funding merchandise, together with quite a few Ethereum futures ETFs.
Bitwise Industries, in the meantime, is a defunct tech firm that doesn’t seem to have labored with cryptocurrency in any approach.
Two U.S. businesses filed fees towards the founders of the latter firm right this moment. The SEC stated that founders Irma Olguin, Jr. and Jake Soberal raised $70 million by falsifying their firm’s monetary data. The Division of Justice (DOJ), in the meantime, stated that the founders conspired to commit wire fraud and took over $100 million earlier than their firm collapsed. The 2 people haven’t been discovered responsible, however every faces as much as 20 years in jail, in addition to fines or penalties from every company.
Equivalent identify has precipitated confusion
The similar identify appeared to trigger confusion on social media, as a number of posts and information articles used the asset administration agency’s brand in reference to the failed agency.
It appears that evidently the crypto market has not been negatively affected by the confusion, as Bitcoin (BTC) is up 0.1% over one hour and is up 2.2% over 24 hours. Nonetheless, additional publicity across the fees might have an ongoing impact on the crypto market.
The publish Bitwise Asset Administration distances itself from failed startup of identical identify appeared first on CryptoSlate.
